Google+
    • Portraits
    • MUSIC
    • Editorial
    • Multiple Exposure Portraits
    • Projector Portraits
    • Dance
    • Commercial
    • Video
  • About
    • Patreon Channel
    • Workshops
    • Lens Filters
    • Remote Photo Shoots
    • Tutorials / Presets
    • Books
    • Prints
  • Blog
  • Contact
Menu

Nick Fancher

Editorial, Music, and Commercial Photographer
  • Portfolio
    • Portraits
    • MUSIC
    • Editorial
    • Multiple Exposure Portraits
    • Projector Portraits
    • Dance
    • Commercial
    • Video
  • About
  • Shop
    • Patreon Channel
    • Workshops
    • Lens Filters
    • Remote Photo Shoots
    • Tutorials / Presets
    • Books
    • Prints
  • Blog
  • Contact
View fullsize s-l1600.jpg
View fullsize DSC03644.jpg

Perfect Imperfections

May 27, 2019

If you were to ask a photographer whether it’s better to invest in a camera or a lens, most would answer lens. After all, no amount of megapixels or camera features can save blurry or ill-rendered images. The lens is the eye of the camera, which is why photographers spend thousands of dollars on them. However, this doesn’t mean that you need an expensive lens to make compelling images.

I, for one, am someone with a limited imagination. What I mean by that is that I need to get my images looking how I want them in camera so all I have left to do is color grade them. So if I want a lens flare or glitch or haziness in my image, I need to introduce that element into my shoot. All that’s to say that recently I’ve spent quite a bit of time scavenging ebay for broken or flawed camera lenses.

As you can see above, I found an old Canon lens that appears to have some sort of fungus growing inside the glass. The investment set me back $30, meaning I didn’t have much to lose in this gamble. Worst case scenario was that it wouldn’t be anything special, in which case I’d at least be able to take a hammer to it until it produced something interesting.

Once it arrived I threw it on my 5DIV only to find that the sensors weren’t working on the lens, resulting in a communication error which couldn’t be overridden. I opted to attach it to my Sony AS7II with a Canon mount converter (I have one of the cheap converters which makes me manually focus). The shot of the flowers above is an unedited raw file. The lens fungus was translating into a wonderful haziness. My gamble had paid off.

View fullsize DSC03686-3.jpg
View fullsize DSC03653.jpg

Once I shot a few images and opened them in Lightroom, I lowered the clarity to help pronounce the haziness and then I dramatically tweaked the tone curves to give the images a solarized feeling. Now that I knew that this beat-up little lens was magical, I was ready to test it on a real person. Side note: I always do my initial photo experiments with an inanimate object, such as flowers, so that I don’t waste the models time should the images prove to be unusable.

View fullsize DSC03829.jpg
View fullsize DSC03798.jpg
View fullsize DSC03926.jpg
View fullsize DSC03944.jpg
View fullsize DSC03957.jpg
View fullsize DSC03986.jpg

I had a brief portrait session with longtime collaborator Desiree Dahl, where I shot two light scenarios in about twenty minutes. For the first setup I placed a light slightly behind each side of her, aiming back toward the camera, in order to get some lens flare. The lens’ haziness complemented the lens flare rather nicely. For the second scenario I switched to a single, yellow-gelled flash, mimicking morning light through a window. The lens’ haziness, in combination with the yellow light, gave the resulting images a Blade Runner 2049 feel to them that made me very happy.

View fullsize DSC04182.jpg
View fullsize DSC04128.jpg
View fullsize DSC04304.jpg
View fullsize DSC04270.jpg

I had to try out the lens in an outdoor setting. It seems like scenarios with bright spots really showcase the glowing flaws of the lens. I met Malaney at an abandoned overpass not far from my studio and waited for the sun to come back out from the clouds. I shot a range of scenarios, with her facing into the sun and with the sun at her back. My favorite shots were the ones where the sun was the brightest, making the glow the most pronounced.

Consider my appetite for broken lenses whetted. Now I’m off to eBay to resume my quest.

Tags shitty lens, blade runner 2049, nick fancher, portrait, photo shoot, bad lens, cheap lens, desiree dahl, photo blog
← Strata IVStrata III →
Nick Fancher | Photo Blog RSS

Latest Posts

  • January 2019 1
  • February 2019 5
  • March 2019 5
  • April 2019 4
  • May 2019 8
  • June 2019 8
  • July 2019 8
  • August 2019 6
  • September 2019 8
  • October 2019 7
  • November 2019 6
  • December 2019 8
  • January 2020 5
  • February 2020 6
  • March 2020 7
  • April 2020 8
  • May 2020 5
  • June 2020 4
  • July 2020 5
  • August 2020 7
  • September 2020 8
  • October 2020 8
  • November 2020 6
  • December 2020 6
  • January 2021 6
  • February 2021 7
  • March 2021 6
  • April 2021 5
  • May 2021 6
  • June 2021 6
  • July 2021 6
  • August 2021 3
  • September 2021 5
  • October 2021 4
  • December 2021 3
  • January 2022 2
  • March 2022 2
  • April 2022 3
  • May 2022 4
  • June 2022 1
  • July 2022 2
  • August 2022 4
  • September 2022 6
  • October 2022 1
  • January 2023 2
  • February 2023 1
  • March 2023 4
  • April 2023 1
  • June 2023 2
  • July 2023 1
  • August 2023 2
  • September 2023 4
  • October 2023 5
  • November 2023 3
  • December 2023 1
  • January 2024 3
  • February 2024 2
  • March 2024 8
  • April 2024 5
  • May 2024 2
  • June 2024 2
  • July 2024 2
  • November 2024 2
  • December 2024 1
  • February 2025 1
  • April 2025 1
  • June 2025 1
  • July 2025 1